Perrydale School District 21
Perrydale School District 21 is located in northwest Oregon. Perrydale School District 21 has 54.46 square miles of land area and 0.11 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Perrydale School District 21 population is 895. Perrydale School District 21 median household income is $67,031 in 2010-2014. Perrydale School District 21 median house value is $350,000 in 2010-2014. On average, Perrydale School District 21 is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Perrydale School District 21 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
7445 Perrydale Rd
Amity OR, 97101, Yamhill County
Phone: 503-835-3184
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 320 | 333 | 328 | 321 | 314 | 332 | 331 |
English Language Learner Students: | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 7 | 10 |
Total Teachers: | 17.59 | 18.44 | 17.80 | 17.77 | 18.50 | 18.30 | 18.00 |
Prekindergarten: | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
Elementary: | 9.85 | 10.72 | 10.70 | 10.68 | 10.91 | 10.60 | 11.80 |
Secondary: | 6.57 | 6.26 | 5.58 | 5.57 | 6.29 | 6.50 | 5.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 18.49 | 16.16 | 15.19 | 16.31 | 11.00 | 11.70 | 11.00 |
Instructional Aides: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
District Administrators: | 0.50 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 13.49 | 11.12 | 10.19 | 12.31 | 7.00 | 7.70 | 7.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 18.19 | 18.06 | 18.43 | 18.06 | 16.97 | 18.14 | 18.39 |
Schools
Perrydale School | Kindergarten to Grade 12 | 7445 Perrydale Rd, Amity OR 97101 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
OAKS Test | |||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 43.2% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.5% | 46.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 45% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 55% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 52% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 54% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 53.6% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 68% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.1% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 69% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 50.5% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 53.5% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 55% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 66% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 66.1% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 85% |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.4% | 59.1% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 60.5% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 62% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 57% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 58% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 70% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.1% | 64% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 63% |
2004 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 18.5% | 48% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 54.4% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 42.3% | 55% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 55% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | N/A |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 55% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 53.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 68% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 67% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 60% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 81.9% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 86.1% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 86% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 48.1% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92% | 76.5% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 63% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 64% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 61% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 85.5% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 87% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 83% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 84% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 82.8% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 83% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63% | 70% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 66% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 88% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 72% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 77.2% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 34.6% | 65% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 66% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 64% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 87% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 80% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 83% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 74% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 73% |
2005 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 24% | 32.4% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.1% | 42% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 45% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 42.3% | 43% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 78.9% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 84% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 85% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 68% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88% | 76.5% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 42.3% | 58% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 37% | 60% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 58% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 76.8% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 81.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 83% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 75% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 76% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 76.3% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 69% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.0% | 68% |
2004 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 69.9% |
2005 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 75% |
2006 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 79% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 75% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 75% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 74.4% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 74% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 69% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.0% | 67% |
2004 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 29.2% | 33.2% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 77% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 76% | 70% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 73% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 72.8% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 50% | 59% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 29.6% | 59% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 59% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 80% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 75% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 73% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 76.5% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 79% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 65% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 63% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 75% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 74% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 74% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77.8% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 61% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 63% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.4% | 61% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 73% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 77% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77.3% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | > 95.0% | 80% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 75% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 73% |
2005 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 39.4% |
2006 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 67.9% | 45% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 48% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 46.4% | 50% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 59.8% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.3% | 63.5% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 66% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 69% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 71% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 70.6% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 65% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 64% | 65% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 63% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 63% | 60% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 62.5% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 66% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 69% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 65% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 70% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 69.5% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 72% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 52% | 68% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 67% |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 59% |
2005 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 65.8% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 68% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 69% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 72% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 70.8% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 71% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 64% | 66% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 66% |
2004 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 37.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $3,135,000 | $9,558 | $3,292,000 | $10,255 | $3,182,000 | $10,134 | |||
Federal: | $177,000 | $540 | 5.6% | $376,000 | $1,171 | 11.4% | $234,000 | $745 | 7.4% |
State: | $2,274,000 | $6,933 | 72.5% | $2,239,000 | $6,975 | 68.0% | $2,318,000 | $7,382 | 72.8% |
Local: | $684,000 | $2,085 | 21.8% | $677,000 | $2,109 | 20.6% | $630,000 | $2,006 | 19.8% |
Total Expenditures: | $3,202,000 | $9,762 | $3,306,000 | $10,299 | $3,207,000 | $10,213 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,972,000 | $9,061 | $2,919,000 | $9,093 | $2,931,000 | $9,334 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,821,000 | $5,552 | 61.3% | $1,827,000 | $5,692 | 62.6% | $1,801,000 | $5,736 | 61.4% |
Student and Staff Support: | $186,000 | $567 | 6.3% | $180,000 | $561 | 6.2% | $175,000 | $557 | 6.0% |
Administration: | $428,000 | $1,305 | 14.4% | $386,000 | $1,202 | 13.2% | $418,000 | $1,331 | 14.3% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $537,000 | $1,637 | 18.1% | $526,000 | $1,639 | 18.0% | $537,000 | $1,710 | 18.3% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $164,000 | $500 | $318,000 | $991 | $205,000 | $653 | |||
Construction: | $121,000 | $369 | $289,000 | $900 | $178,000 | $567 | |||
Total Other: | $29,000 | $88 | $29,000 | $90 | $29,000 | $92 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $37,000 | $113 | $40,000 | $125 | $42,000 | $134 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,418,000 | $4,323 | $1,413,000 | $4,402 | $1,414,000 | $4,503 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $997,000 | $3,040 | 70.3% | $993,000 | $3,093 | 70.3% | $1,019,000 | $3,245 | 72.1% |
Other Salary: | $421,000 | $1,284 | 29.7% | $420,000 | $1,308 | 29.7% | $395,000 | $1,258 | 27.9% |
Total Benefit: | $796,000 | $2,427 | $740,000 | $2,305 | $731,000 | $2,328 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $528,000 | $1,610 | 66.3% | $485,000 | $1,511 | 65.5% | $496,000 | $1,580 | 67.9% |
Other Benefit: | $268,000 | $817 | 33.7% | $255,000 | $794 | 34.5% | $235,000 | $748 | 32.1% |
* Perrydale School District 21 was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.