South Pekin School District 137
South Pekin School District 137 is located close to the center of Illinois. South Pekin School District 137 has 3.00 square miles of land area and has no water area. As of 2010-2014, the total South Pekin School District 137 population is 1,830. South Pekin School District 137 median household income is $45,917 in 2010-2014. South Pekin School District 137 median house value is $73,800 in 2010-2014. On average, South Pekin School District 137 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
South Pekin School District 137 Map and Nearby Locations
206 Main St
South Pekin IL, 61564, Tazewell County
Phone: 309-348-3695
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 214 | 214 | 221 | 223 | 240 | 241 | 253 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 17.90 | NA | 15.11 | 17.23 | 18.00 | 20.80 | 15.50 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 17.90 | NA | 13.11 | 16.12 | 16.00 | 18.80 | 9.50 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 5.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 7.20 | 9.45 | 3.30 | 3.36 | 3.29 | 3.20 | 7.30 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 3.50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.30 |
School Administrators: | 0.20 | NA | 0.15 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 1.98 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Other Support Services: | 6.00 | 3.95 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 11.96 | NA | 14.63 | 12.94 | 13.33 | 11.59 | 16.32 |
Schools
South Pekin Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 206 Main St, South Pekin IL 61564 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 33.4% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 41.2% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 64% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 47.1% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.6% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.5% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.7% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.2% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.6% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.0% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.9% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.7% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 29.6% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 60% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 44.0% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.4% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 63% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 31.6% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 59.3% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 36.8% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 40.5% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 45.9% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 16.0% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 43.2% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.1% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 32.0% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,315,000 | $10,475 | $2,604,000 | $11,677 | $2,363,000 | $9,846 | |||
Federal: | $261,000 | $1,181 | 11.3% | $453,000 | $2,031 | 17.4% | $477,000 | $1,988 | 20.2% |
State: | $1,589,000 | $7,190 | 68.6% | $1,730,000 | $7,758 | 66.4% | $1,494,000 | $6,225 | 63.2% |
Local: | $465,000 | $2,104 | 20.1% | $421,000 | $1,888 | 16.2% | $392,000 | $1,633 | 16.6% |
Total Expenditures: | $3,128,000 | $14,154 | $2,455,000 | $11,009 | $2,321,000 | $9,671 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,136,000 | $9,665 | $2,319,000 | $10,399 | $2,219,000 | $9,246 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,178,000 | $5,330 | 55.1% | $1,202,000 | $5,390 | 51.8% | $1,290,000 | $5,375 | 58.1% |
Student and Staff Support: | $171,000 | $774 | 8.0% | $144,000 | $646 | 6.2% | $215,000 | $896 | 9.7% |
Administration: | $340,000 | $1,538 | 15.9% | $408,000 | $1,830 | 17.6% | $313,000 | $1,304 | 14.1% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $447,000 | $2,023 | 20.9% | $565,000 | $2,534 | 24.4% | $401,000 | $1,671 | 18.1% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $911,000 | $4,122 | $42,000 | $188 | $9,000 | $38 | |||
Construction: | $908,000 | $4,109 | $24,000 | $108 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $3,000 | $13 | $1,000 | $4 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $6,000 | $27 | $7,000 | $31 | $7,000 | $29 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,259,000 | $5,697 | $1,244,000 | $5,578 | $1,386,000 | $5,775 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $812,000 | $3,674 | 64.5% | $828,000 | $3,713 | 66.6% | $907,000 | $3,779 | 65.4% |
Other Salary: | $447,000 | $2,023 | 35.5% | $416,000 | $1,865 | 33.4% | $479,000 | $1,996 | 34.6% |
Total Benefit: | $532,000 | $2,407 | $451,000 | $2,022 | $502,000 | $2,092 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $345,000 | $1,561 | 64.8% | $296,000 | $1,327 | 65.6% | $333,000 | $1,388 | 66.3% |
Other Benefit: | $187,000 | $846 | 35.2% | $155,000 | $695 | 34.4% | $169,000 | $704 | 33.7% |
* South Pekin School District 137 was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.